Overview of Beauge, Maxence vs Gautier, Alexis
The upcoming match between Maxence Beauge and Alexis Gautier is poised to be an intriguing encounter in the tennis world. Both players bring distinct styles to the court, with Beauge known for his aggressive baseline play and Gautier renowned for his exceptional defensive skills. This match promises to be a test of strategy and endurance, as each player will aim to exploit their opponent’s weaknesses while capitalizing on their own strengths.
Beauge, Maxence
Gautier,Alexis
(FT)
Predictions:
Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
---|---|---|---|
Over 1st Set Games | 76.90% | (0-2) | |
Under 1st Set Games | 53.60% | (0-2) | |
Tie Break in 1st Set (No) | 82.60% | (0-2) | |
Tie Break in Match (No) | 70.40% | (0-2) | |
Under 2.5 Sets | 64.90% | (0-2) | |
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) | 55.60% | (0-2) | |
Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5) | 51.60% | (0-2) |
Betting Predictions
Set Games
The prediction for the first set games indicates a higher likelihood of over 7.5 games, priced at 75.80. This suggests that the first set may extend beyond the typical quick exchanges, potentially due to the players’ contrasting styles leading to longer rallies.
Tie Breaks
There is a strong probability that no tie break will occur in the first set, with odds at 83.90. This aligns with the expectation of a prolonged set, where players might push each other to the limit without reaching a tie break scenario.
Similarly, the likelihood of avoiding a tie break in the entire match is high at 73.90. This suggests that either player could secure a decisive victory in straight sets or through a decisive third set.
Set Count
The odds favor fewer than 2.5 sets at 66.60, indicating a potential for one player to dominate and close out the match swiftly in straight sets.
Total Games
The prediction for total games being under 22 stands at 53.30 for a 3-way bet, while under 22.5 is priced at 52.00 for a 2-way bet. These odds reflect an expectation of a tightly contested match, possibly extending into longer sets but not excessively so.